2025-UNAT-1567, Anastasia Rotheroe
The UNAT held that the UNDT had not erred in finding that it had been proven by clear and convincing evidence that the staff member had engaged in harassment and abuse of authority, used her office for personal reasons to prejudice the position of a colleague, disclosed sensitive information, failed to report the possible misconduct of others, used a personal e-mail address contrary to the applicable provisions, and exchanged inappropriate messages about colleagues.
The UNAT found that regardless of whether she had been a whistleblower engaged in a protected activity, there was no evidence that...