UNDT/2011/071

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal held that the Applicant had not raised a prima facie case that the decision was arguably unlawful or that he would suffer irreparable damage from its implementation.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to place him on the roster upon the conclusion of the recruitment exercise for the post of Chief Supply Officer at the P-5 level under vacancy announcement (VA) 424630.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

Outcome Extra Text

The application for suspension of action was rejected.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Chawla

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement