鶹ý

UNDT/2013/136

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The UNDT found that the two posts in question were available only temporarily and therefore the Administration’s decision to advertise them as temporary vacancies was lawful. With respect to the first vacancy, the UNDT found that, as the successful candidate declined the offer, it was appropriate for the Administration to fill the temporarily vacant post through a lateral transfer. The UNDT further found that this decision was made by a person with proper delegation of authority. With respect to the second vacancy, the UNDT found that the selection exercise was also lawful. The application was dismissed.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant, a staff member of the Procurement Division, Department of Management in New York, contested the “filling and/or placement of staff on two regular vacant (P-4) Team Leadership positions … without having issued a job opening”.

Legal Principle(s)

Temporary vacancy: If a fixed-term post becomes temporarily vacant for a period of less than one year but more than three months, the Administration is generally required under its rules to issue a temporary vacancy announcement. Lateral transfer: Head of Office has the delegated authority to transfer staff laterally within her or his department. Allegation of unlawfulness: Suspicion alone, without any rational basis, is not enough to substantiate an allegation of unlawfulness.

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Charles