UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements
The challenge against the UMOJA process and its automated response to the Applicant, as articulated in this application, is therefore not receivable ratione materiae. If there was no action taken in the Applicant’s precise individual case but there was only general action applicable to all staff members, there is no administrative decision for purposes of pursuing a receivable appeal to the Tribunal. If the action that is challenged produced no direct legal consequences, this is a further lacuna in the subject matter of an appeal that renders it not receivable.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
Challenge against the Respondent’s decision to apply “the old rules” relating to rest and recuperation breaks in hardship duty stations, which practise the Applicant argues requires him to knowingly provide false information.
Legal Principle(s)
The contested UMOJA automated responses or notifications do not constitute an administrative decision, because they neither applied individually to the Applicant nor produced any legal consequences that were inconsistent with his terms of employment.